← All perspectives

Company · Real Assets · Equity · 2024

The Parking Annuity: How a Cash Business at the Curb Became Recurring Revenue the Market Still Prices as a Toll Booth

Urban parking is treated as a sleepy, transactional hard asset — a toll booth that takes cash and closes at night. It isn't anymore. COVID quietly converted it into a recurring-revenue business, and a thin layer of software plugs the places it leaks cash. We underwrote a platform at roughly half the multiple the market pays for exactly that.

Here is a number that should not be possible in a modern business: when the gate at a parking garage breaks, up to a tenth of that garage's revenue can simply drive away.

It happens constantly. Legacy gated garages run on paper tickets and pay stations that fail more often than anyone admits, and when the equipment goes down, the honest driver still wants to leave — so the gate lifts, or someone waves the line through, and the money walks. Across the industry, legacy gated facilities collect only about 90–93% of the fees they are owed. That 7–10% leak is not a rounding error. It is pure, high-margin revenue falling out of the bottom of an otherwise healthy business, every day, unnoticed — because the asset is treated as too boring to look at closely.

That inattention is the opportunity. Urban parking is one of the last large, cash-generative, real-asset businesses that the market still prices like a relic — even as its economics have quietly transformed into something an institutional allocator should want to own.

What Actually Happened to Parking

For decades, the knock on parking was that it was transactional: revenue arrived one hourly ticket at a time, tied to office foot traffic, cyclical with the economy, and impossible to forecast. A toll booth. You collected what came through the gate that day.

Then COVID broke the toll booth — and, counterintuitively, made the business better.

When offices emptied in 2020, transient parking — the walk-up hourly driver — collapsed, and US parking revenue fell nearly 14%. But the operators who survived did so by leaning into the other revenue stream: the monthly contract parker. The resident, the reserved corporate spot, the building tenant — the parker who pays a fixed amount every month whether they show up or not. And that base proved remarkably durable. By 2023, at well-run urban portfolios, monthly-contract income had recovered to or above its pre-pandemic level even as transient volumes still lagged — meaning a large share of revenue had migrated from unpredictable daily tickets to sticky, recurring monthly commitments.

We call the result the Parking Annuity: a business the market still underwrites as a cyclical, transactional hard asset that has, in fact, become a recurring-revenue platform with a real-estate floor underneath it. A dominant share of revenue now comes from monthly parkers who renew by default, and the transient traffic that remains is geographically captive — a driver in a dense urban core pays what the location commands. Recurring revenue at the base, pricing power on top.

That is not a toll booth. It is closer to a subscription business that happens to own the curb.

Why the Market Hasn't Repriced It

Here is the arbitrage. Recurring-revenue platforms trade at premium multiples precisely because their cash flows are predictable — that is the entire logic of the software and subscription economy. Yet parking operators, now carrying exactly those recurring characteristics, still change hands at multiples set by the old, transactional perception.

The gap is wide and documented. Parking operating platforms have transacted at an average of roughly 14x EBITDA across the last cycle of deals — and one prior build in this sector was assembled by buying operators at 8–10x, growing their EBITDA at a ~20% annual clip, and exiting the platform at 12x for more than a 4x return on invested equity. The recurring-revenue re-rating is not hypothetical; it has already been harvested once by operators who understood what they were holding.

The transaction we advised was underwritten to enter near 7x — roughly half the sector's transaction average. Buying a recurring-revenue platform at a transactional-asset price is the whole game. The market's inattention was the entry point.

Why does the perception lag the reality? Because the re-rating is recent and invisible on the surface. A garage looks the same whether 40% or 65% of its revenue renews automatically — the change is in the composition of the cash flow, not the concrete, and composition doesn't show up in a drive-by. Buyers who still anchor to the pre-COVID caricature of parking — cyclical, transient-driven, hostage to office traffic — underwrite the risk of the old business and miss that they are being offered the cash-flow profile of a different, better one. That gap between perception and cash flow is exactly the kind of mispricing that appears when a sector transitions faster than its reputation, and it is precisely where a principal willing to do the work earns the spread.

The Value We Would Unlock — Four Levers on One Asset

An entry discount is only worth having if you can compound from it. The plan rested on four operating levers, each of which turns the "boring asset" perception against the seller.

1. Plug the leak — tech enablement. This is the sharpest lever and it ties directly to that opening number. A modern, appless mobile access-and-payment layer — a driver dials a number, a camera reads the plate, the account is charged on exit, no ticket and no dependence on a gate that breaks — lifts fee collection from that 90–93% toward ~100%. Recapturing a 7–10% revenue leak drops almost entirely to the bottom line, because the cost to serve barely moves. And it installs at a fraction of legacy equipment cost — roughly $27,000 a site against the ~$400,000 plus $50,000 a year in maintenance that traditional gate systems demand. A physical parking portfolio becomes, in effect, a software-margin business layered on real assets — inside a smart-parking technology market growing from about $6 billion to $28 billion this decade.

2. Pricing leverage. Urban parking is chronically underpriced relative to its captivity. Geographically inelastic transient demand absorbs steady annual rate increases — on the order of 5% — and monthly rates lift more slowly but off a sticky, renewing base. Neither requires a new customer.

3. Capacity and yield. Better utilization of existing stalls — dynamic, demand-based pricing enabled by the same software layer, capturing surge windows a static rate card leaves on the table — plus EV-charging conversions that turn dead concrete into a second revenue stream per space.

4. Organic growth. A fragmented market — roughly 40,000 facilities and 8,000 operators, with the largest players holding under 35% of the market — throws off a continuous pipeline of new management contracts for a credible operator to win. Same-platform revenue compounds without a single acquisition.

Four levers, none of which depends on the economy cooperating or the market re-rating on its own. The re-rating is the upside; the levers are what we control.

Why We Reviewed It as Principals

A note on standard. We came to this as an advisor — but structured to be paid substantially in equity rather than a fee collected at closing. That alignment is deliberate, and it changes the work: we underwrote every number as if the capital were our own, which meant leading with the downside and stress-testing the leaks, not the projections.

The operating team was the reason to believe. This was a group that had built and exited a parking platform in this exact sector before — the 8–10x-in, 12x-out, 4x-MOIC precedent above was theirs — with proprietary pricing tools and a hundred-plus combined years running garages. A proven operator, a recurring-revenue transition already underway, an engineered set of growth levers, and an entry price built to protect the downside: the four things we look for, in one asset.

What Protects the Downside

We underwrote urban parking as a real-asset, recurring-revenue business whose risks are specific and largely structural.

  • A hard-asset and recurring-revenue floor. Real estate underneath, a majority of revenue from renewing monthly contracts — cash flow that does not evaporate in a soft quarter the way pure transient traffic would.
  • Entry at half the sector's multiple. A ~7x entry against ~14x sector transactions is itself downside protection: the re-rating you did not pay for cannot be taken away.
  • Asset-light, low-capex operations. Management and lease structures rather than owned concrete on the balance sheet; the tech layer installs at ~1/15th of legacy cost.
  • A durable tailwind still only half-arrived. Office attendance has recovered to roughly three-quarters of pre-pandemic levels — meaning the transient recovery still has runway, and the thesis does not need it to fully return to work.

The honest risks are equally concrete, and we named them. Much of the modeled upside came from layering on new pricing and technology fees, which assumes drivers absorb them without meaningful attrition — a reasonable but unproven bet on a specific asset. Operator EBITDA in this sector is often heavily adjusted, so the quality of earnings has to be diligenced line by line, not taken from a summary page. City-specific policy — congestion pricing, façade-compliance closures — can dent transient economics, though comparable precedents abroad saw driver behavior normalize within roughly six months. And the recurring-revenue transition, while real, is younger than a decade of history would be; it must be underwritten as a trend with momentum, not a law.

The through-line is the one we apply everywhere: buy the recurring-revenue platform while the market still prices the toll booth, plug the leaks the incumbents ignore, and let a proven operator compound the difference. The gate will keep breaking. The question is only who collects when it does.

This is how we underwrite — the cost line, the leaks, and the downside first, whether we hold the equity or advise on it. If real assets, recurring-revenue infrastructure, or tech-enabled roll-ups are on your radar, we're glad to walk through the work.